- To: cf-satellite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [cf-satellite] Proposal for naming convention for swath dimensions
- From: Jim Biard <Jim.Biard@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:59:00 -0400
I suggested in the ESIP Federation CF-Satellite discussion yesterday
(July 14, 2011) that the names "line" and "sample" could be good
candidates for the names of the geometrical dimensions of swath data
variables. I think that these are more generic than previous
suggestions, and accommodate a wider range of data acquisition schemes.
There can be sensors out there for which even these names are
"incorrect", but the vast majority of the data is produced as a raster
of some sort. This is common terminology in many other arenas
(photogrammetry, for example).
-- Jim Biard Government Contractor, STG Inc. Remote Sensing and Applications Division (RSAD) National Climatic Data Center 151 Patton Ave. Asheville, NC 28801-5001 jim.biard@xxxxxxxx 828-271-4900
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cf-satellite] Proposal for naming convention for swath dimensions
- From: Russ Rew
- Re: [cf-satellite] Proposal for naming convention for swath dimensions
- From: Mary Jo Brodzik
- Re: [cf-satellite] Proposal for naming convention for swath dimensions