NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: [cf-satellite] very rough draft of way to represent band

NOTE: The cf-satellite mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

  • To: Jim Biard <Jim.Biard@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [cf-satellite] very rough draft of way to represent band
  • From: Tom Whittaker <whittaker@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:39:10 -0500
Hi Jim...
> I used "the_image" because I was too lazy to hunt up a proper name.  I think
> the standard name for the image data will vary widely depending on the
> contents.  It could be brightness temperature, radiance, or something else
> altogether.  I don't think there will be a single standard name.

As long as an application can uniquely identify such a variable as "an
image" (where appropriate), I don't think a standard_name would even
been needed.  That, to me, is the central issue:  an application gets
the attributes for a variable and needs to figure out what it is.  If
there were a generic standard_name, that would help; however, in the
absence of that, then the app would have to look at the shape and/or
coordinates and explore those variables to see if any of them stands
out as meaning "this is an image".

> In this example, there is no problem with sequential-valued coordinate
> variables.  The only true coordinate variable is the one named bandit.  The
> others are data variables that are identified as auxiliary coordinates in
> the coordinates attribute of the image variable.  These variables can have
> values that repeat, alternate, etc.  Everything is driven by the parametric
> coordinate variable bandit.  (Which, as I suggested previously, could be an
> array of strings that uniquely named the different bands instead of an array
> of integers.  It functions as a key.)

My head is thick, obviously.  But I've got it now:  we have a
"dimension" which is also a "coordinate variable" with a unique
"_CoordinateAxisType".  The contents (values) of the variable,
however, could be most anything -- the key is that it is easily
recognized as such and is used to dimension other variables with
metadata (like central wavelengths or something).

Thanks...

tom

-- 
Tom Whittaker
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Space Science & Engineering Center (SSEC)
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS)
1225 W. Dayton Street
Madison, WI  53706  USA
ph: +1 608 262 2759



  • 2011 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the cf-satellite archives: