NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Becky, I've used the 12 km NAM data from the NOMADS site, but could probably benefit by having it come via CONDUIT. I wouldn't rule out a need for using the 13 km RAP data either. Bill On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Gerry Creager <gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx>wrote: > Becky > > Thanks for getting back to me. We are interested in the 12 km NAM and 13 > km (130 grid) RAP data. If that's possible, it'd be a help. When I first > asked on the LDM list, there was at least one other researcher interested > in higher resolution NAM and RAP. Somehow, I don't think I'd be the only > user. > > Appreciate the help, and I fully understand about the delays for new > systems and schedules. > > Regards, > Gerry > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Rebecca Cosgrove < > rebecca.cosgrove@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ** >> Gerry, >> I apologize for my delayed response. >> Right now we've got a limit on adding new data to CONDUIT until we >> upgrade our system here at NCEP. We're in the process of that upgrade >> right now. I'll submit your request for additional NAM 12km fields to the >> User Committee meeting on the 17th for consideration after the upgrade. If >> others in the group would like to see this data, I encourage you to chime >> in and voice your desire for this as well. >> >> For the RAP, we do have 20km and 40km grids for the CONUS available in >> CONDUIT. Is there additional RAP data you are interested in? >> >> Becky Cosgrove >> NCEP Central Operations >> >> CONDUIT folk >> >> We're working on a project and I'd configured a CONDUIT feed to acquire >> NAM 218 data. My plan was to kick off processing using a PQACT action when >> the last of the needed data arrived. Problem: We get the surface fields, >> which is not sufficient to initialize WRF. Of course, I can go download the >> data from NCEP (in fact, that's what we're now doing) but I'm wondering: Am >> I the only one looking for these data? Is there sufficient bandwidth to >> allow carrying the full NAM 12 km dataset? What's the chances of getting >> NAM (and, for that matter, RAP) added? >> >> Thanks, Gerry >> OU/CIMMS/NSSL >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> conduit mailing listconduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > conduit mailing list > conduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ > -- Dr. William A. Gallus, Jr. Professor of Meteorology Dept. of Geological and Atmospheric Science Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011 515-294-2270
conduit archives: