Re: [conduit] GFS pgrb2.0p25 missing a lot of fields

• To: "Person, Arthur A." <aap1@xxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [conduit] GFS pgrb2.0p25 missing a lot of fields
• From: Mike Zuranski <mzuranski@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 21:27:58 -0500

Hi Art,

This may be the result of a known issue post-upgrade, one that should
hopefully be addressed tomorrow morning:
https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/archives/conduit/2023/msg00021.html

Looks like we'll see with the 18Z run if that fixes things, although we
should see with other models (e.g. RAP) sooner.

-Mike


*Mike Zuranski*
Data Engineer II
Unidata Program Center
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research


On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 7:10 PM Person, Arthur A. <aap1@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi...
>
> Seems like the GFS pgrb2.0p25 (and probably 0p50 also) data are missing a
> lot of fields with the RH8 upgrade, e.g. PMSL. Anyone else seeing this?
>
>               Art
>
> Arthur A. Person
> Assistant Research Professor, System Administrator
> Penn State Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science
> email:  aap1@xxxxxxx, phone:  814-863-1563 <callto:814-863-1563>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are
> recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly
> available through the web.  Users who post to any of the lists we
> maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they
> do not want to be made public.
>
>
> conduit mailing list
> conduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [conduit] GFS pgrb2.0p25 missing a lot of fields
    • From: Pete Pokrandt

• References:
  • [conduit] GFS pgrb2.0p25 missing a lot of fields
    • From: Person, Arthur A.