NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

RE: [GMLJP2] NetCDF <--> GML/JPEG2000

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

  • To: John Caron; Sean Forde
  • Subject: RE: [GMLJP2] NetCDF <--> GML/JPEG2000
  • From: rlake@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:20:03 -0700
HI,

I agree with Simon's description - but it would not be difficult to
generalize the current coverage concept to allow the domain to be other than
a spatial-temporal region.

Ron

Sent: May 12, 2005 6:53 PM

Yes.
Perhaps the most important differences between the GML/ISO concept of
"coverage" and netCDF and allies are:

1. netCDF etc support rather generalised mappings between arrays.
Thus the "domain" of the data (the independent variable, if you like) is not
really contrained.
In contrast, a geospatial coverage is a specialisation in which the domain
must be spatio-temporal, i.e. between 1 and 4 dimensions.
As Ron points out, JP2K is even more restricted in this sense - it only
supports 2D domains.
2. There is explicit support for registering the domain of a geospatial
coverage to real-world locations - the most well-known is where the domain
is a rectified grid, but other geometries may be used which are tied to a
spatial reference system.
3. As Ron points out, an "Observation" is the act of collecting some values
associated with a target.
The "result" of an observation is essentially parallel to the "range" in a
coverage. The "target" of an observation is parallel to the "domain".
The Observation viewpoint focusses on the observation event, and is
primarily a means to access metadata associated with property values - how
they were obtained, when, by whone, etc.
This is of interest when trying to assess data reliability, and for data
insertion.
Futher down the chain, Observation/result values will often be collated into
"coverages" in preparation for some analysis, anomaly or feature-detection,
etc.
But it is very much the case that the structure of a "coverage" when
expressed as a map of the range over the domain is the same as the structure
of a an observation which maps a result to a target.
See https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/twiki/bin/view/Xmml/ObservationsAndMeasurements
for some detail.
Simon





  • 2005 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: