NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

RE: Thoughts on GALEON Phase 2

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

But please note that GML is *not* a language - it is a toolkit for building languages. CSML is one such GML APplication language. SensorML is not ... yet, but ought to be! 

Simon
-----Original Message----- From: owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gerry Creager N5JXS Sent: Tue 28/02/2006 10:27 PM To: rhusar@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: GALEON email list Subject: Re: Thoughts on GALEON Phase 2 


Rudy,

I tend to agree and I think that's the point I was trying to make.
We're going to need to consider, over time, a more encompassing language
to describe these.  ESML, SensorML, and GML are all key elements, but no
one markup, in itself, is sufficient.  I hate to think in terms of
supersetting these markups, as we could well lose the ability to manage
their content, and then lose precision in description.  However, I
suspect that such supersetting will provide the mechanism to extend
each, and eventually find a way to resolve to a more common theme.

Thanks for the pointer to the AQ work.  I was actually looking for
something like this to support our TexAQS studies!

gerry
  • 2006 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: