NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

RE: Thoughts on GALEON Phase 2

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

Hi,

Yes - I would say a "language to build languages" - but a tool kit to
build languages is good too. So this makes GML quite different than
SensorML or CSML - as they are end use application languages.  So super
setting GML is the normal practice.

Ron


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simon.Cox@xxxxxxxx
Sent: February 28, 2006 2:29 PM
To: gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx; rhusar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Thoughts on GALEON Phase 2

But please note that GML is *not* a language - it is a toolkit for building 
languages. CSML is one such GML APplication language. SensorML is not ... yet, 
but ought to be!

Simon
  • 2006 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: