NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Yes - samplingFeature could have been used where I used coverage in my previous email Ron
-----Original Message----- From: galeon-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:galeon-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simon.Cox@xxxxxxxx Sent: March 13, 2008 7:25 PM To: bermudez@xxxxxxxxx Cc: galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [galeon] Fwd: CDM feature and point types docs Actually they are referring to the characteristics of the sampling strategy. This can be described in the context of the procedure/platform/sensor, or in the context of the foi, or simply reflected by the coverage-domain within a result expressed as a coverage. They are none of them wrong. My sense is that common practice in the fluid-earth sciences is the latter - mostly what is being shifted around is a result-with-sampling-strategy-embedded-within (i.e. the grid parameters). That's OK. IMHO the O&M model allows us to understand this better as it provides a language to describe it.
galeon archives: