NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: [galeon] Next Steps for CF-netCDF encoding document

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

Ben,

 

A few things:

 

1.       Ensure that the comments you have already received are
addressed.  I know a few of WCS SWG members sent comments in the past.

2.       A big question is what is your target WCS version?  Are you
shooting for WCS 1.1, WCS 2.0, or both?

3.       I believe the final goal is to make the extension a full
fledged OGC standard. To that end you should edit the document so that
it matches the OGC's template for standards.  Also, I suggest trying to
follow the OGC policies from OGC 08-131r1 - OGC Specification Model.

 

Cheers

--

Steven Keens

 

  _____  

From: galeon-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:galeon-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ben Domenico
Sent: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009 12:10
To: WCS SWG; Unidata GALEON
Subject: [galeon] Next Steps for CF-netCDF encoding document

 

Hi,

 

At the last OGC meeting in Athens, the OGC Technical Committee members
approved release of 09-018 Web Coverage Service (WCS) extension for
CF-netCDF encoding, 1.0 as an OGC Discussion Paper.  The document 09-018
is posted here:
http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=32195
<http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=32195> 

 

The question now is what are the next steps?  Related issues are:

 

1. How can we insure the Discussion Paper really does get adequate
discussion?

 

2. After we are convinced that there has been adequate discussion,
should a revised version of the paper be submitted as a "best practices
paper" or should the next step be to propose it as a WCS extension
standard?"

3. The 3 week deadline for submission of documents for voting at the
next TC meeting (Boston, June 22-24) is approaching.  Do we want to
submit the paper as a best practices or extension standard document for
consideration by the TC at that meeting?  Clearly there has not been a
lot of discussion as yet, but such a submission might be a catalyst.

 

Your thoughts and suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

 

-- Ben

  • 2009 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: