NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

[galeon] Highlights of the OGC Technical Committee Meetings

NOTE: The galeon mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

Hello,


Below is the powerpoint summary of the CF-netCDF Standards Working Group
session at last week's OpenGeospatial Consortium Technical Committee
meeting.   The session was held Tuesday, 21 September 2010   11:00 – 13:00


   - One (positive) comment so far from the RFC on the Core and Binary
   Encoding CF-netCDF Candidate Standards
   - Note that CF governing committee has been contacted regarding  CF
   submission to OGC, modeled on NASA SPG spec (Ben Domenico)
   - Description of the CF extension to the netCDF core (Stefano Nativi)
   - Description of the CF-netCDF encoding extension to WCS (Stefano)
   - General Discussion
   - No motions, no votes

The resulting SWG action items were:

   - Follow up on suggestion to standardize vocabulary for some netCDF
   global variables.
   - Investigate sending a copy of OGC CF-netCDF RFC to the CF-conventions
   mail list
   - Check with HDF group to see if they are considering OGC standardization
   - Investigate which version of CF addresses CRS/Datum issues
   - Get the version numbers correct for all the standards being proposed
   and referenced in the CF-netCDF specs.
   - Get OPeNDAP community input on mechanism proposed to deliver OPeNDAP
   URL as a proxy for a netCDF file

One other topic of special interest that came up at the meeting is the fact
that the stars are aligning for a couple meetings in Colorado a year from
now.  UCAR/Unidata is hosting the OGC Technical Committee meetings the week
of September 19, 2011 in Boulder and the FOSS4G (Free and Open Source 4
Geosciences) meetings and workshops are the week before (Sept 12) in Denver .
 Both these meetings are of interest to many members of the community and we
have people involved in planning for both.  In addition, we could plan for a
special presence at either or both meetings or possibly could plan a
"bridge" meeting/workshop of some sort between the two.

-- Ben
  • 2010 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the galeon archives: