NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: Font differences between Gempak5.9.2 and Gempak5.10.2

Pete,
Thanks for your suggestion. I was indeed using the "gif" driver, but when I use the "gf" driver instead I get similar results as I show below. The main thing I'm having trouble figuring out is why this won't plot correctly in GEMPAK5.10.2, while it works fine in GEMPAK5.9.2.

In my previous examples I was using gif, now I use the gf driver: (DEVICE = gf|OUTPUTFILE|800;600)

GEMPAK5.9.2, using SFMAP:
TEXT= .7:
http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-e.gif
TEXT=1/21/SW:
http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-f.gif

BUT,
GEMPAK5.10.2, using SFMAP:
TEXT= .7:
http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-g.gif
TEXT=1/21/SW:
http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-h.gif

 Anyone?


At 08:00 PM 8/12/2007, pmanousos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Mike..

The only thing I can think of offhand is be sure the driver is set to gf instead of gif.

For example

device = gf|test.gif

instead of

device = gif|test.gif
The "gif" driver (not "gf") will not accept hw fonts.

Pete



  • 2007 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the gembud archives: