Re: [gembud] GEMPAK GRIB Bug?

• To: "dmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jhuddleston@xxxxxxxxxx" <jhuddleston@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [gembud] GEMPAK GRIB Bug?
• From: Brent L Shaw <bshaw@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:12:25 -0500

I originally found the problem in 5.10.2, but I have also tried 5.11.1 and 
observed the same issue.

Thanks to both NCEP and Unidata for looking into this!  I appreciate the effort 
of both organizations.

Best regards,
Brent

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Don Murray [mailto:dmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:16 AM
>To: jhuddleston@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [gembud] GEMPAK GRIB Bug?
>
>Unidata made one change and NCEP made a different one to the routine
>to handle the constant grids.  There is no blame here - Scott showed
>me the message before he sent it (I've been at NCEP all week) and
>I approved what he said.  We will get the Unidata distribution fixed,
>but might wait until the 5.11.3 release.
>
>Brent, which version of GEMPAK were you using for your tests?
>I didn't see that in your e-mail. (You can answer offline if you want).
>
>Don

• References:
  • [gembud] GEMPAK GRIB Bug?
    • From: Brent L Shaw
  • Re: [gembud] GEMPAK GRIB Bug?
    • From: Scott Jacobs
  • Re: [gembud] GEMPAK GRIB Bug?
    • From: John Huddleston
  • Re: [gembud] GEMPAK GRIB Bug?
    • From: Don Murray