NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: [gembud] [ldm-users] GOES 12 outage, GOES 13 changes for GEMPAK

  • To: "Stonie R. Cooper" <stonewall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gembud] [ldm-users] GOES 12 outage, GOES 13 changes for GEMPAK
  • From: "Arthur A. Person" <person@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:58:14 -0500 (EST)
Stonie,

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Stonie R. Cooper wrote:


Art - I have heard that older versions of GEMPAK require the value of
180 instead of 80.
Oh boy... we seem to have a pickle here... I was actually using 180 for GOES-13 because I looked it up at Wisconsin somewhere and it works for McIDAS GOES-13 imagery and GINI data ftp'd from the NWS, but not for IDD Noaaport GINI. However, I just tried changing it to 80 for GOES-13, and now it works for the IDD Noaaport GINI, but no longer works for McIDAS GOES-13 and data ftp'd from the NWS... any suggestions? 

                              Art
  • 2008 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the gembud archives: