NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hi Heiko- Heiko Klein wrote:
thanks a lot. With the new nightly version I'm able to get nice vertical cross-sections. The alps where correctly positioned and the values seems okay.
Glad this is working for you now. It was just a stupid programming mistake. The fix I put in should also make it faster to switch positions.
The automatical selection of the projection still doesn't work with the 3d fields, and the grid-cells are placed according to their lat lon points in the default (mercator?) grid instead of in the polar-stereographic grid. I have to manually select the projection of one of the 2d fields to get my projection.
As I mentioned in the previous e-mail, it's the nature of trying to have a relationship between sigma and altitude. In the process, the projection information is lost and all we are left with is the lat/lon points. I don't have a solution for this, but will keep pondering on a way to do it. Don ************************************************************* Don Murray UCAR Unidata Program dmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx P.O. Box 3000 (303) 497-8628 Boulder, CO 80307 http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/donm *************************************************************
idvusers archives: