NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
In message <3B88A3A5.B9E6D7B0@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Mullenax writes: > Jeff Wolfe wrote: > > Jeff, > > GEMPAK was compiled with straight -O on both boxes. Both were running Solaris > 8 and patched. I am not sure about compiler patches (I don't administer > the 6500) but it is FORTE 6 (just plain 6, not the updates). The 6500 has > like 10G of memory..over 8G free..the U10 512MB. I was comparing the time it > took > to run gdradr which compites every NEXRAD site. It took 15 seconds longer > on the 6500 AND the data was local there while it was NFS mounted on the U10. Hrm. I presume there wasn't much happening on the 6500 either? I would definately make sure you have all the FORTE patches installed. Have you tried building gempak with the -fast compiler option? That should provide a significant performance improvement. -Jeff
ldm-users archives: