NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

NOAAPort latency followup.

By all means this is wonderful.  It was really becoming
a problem.  Although to be fair, it is really OS independent
as Solaris Intel, SCO, BSD..etc would have produced the
same result.  The real key lies in the x86 hardware.
I am glad that NWS are recognizing that the reliability
gap is now closed between x86 boxes and very expensive
RISC/MIPS systems if you stick to high-quality, high end
components. 

I lament everyday how slow our even fairly recent Sun
systems are in comparison to our Solaris Intel Dell
boxes.



-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:02 AM


As a followup to last week's switch over to Linux SBN uplink machines and 
latency issues for NOAAPort and NOAAPort dependent systems:

Time on Queue Statistics - Units are in seconds, for NCF.
-----------------------------
Channel                  Max     Average
-----------------------------
GOESEast Queue  102     40
GOESWest Queue  12      4
NWSTG Queue             45      1
DCP Queue               49      1
-----------------------------

These are the "fastest" times (lowest latency) that I have seen on NOAAPort.

The massive improvement with a Linux solution should benefit us all . . .
and 
kudos should go to NOAA for having the foresight to implement a technically 
and economically better SBN uplink facility.  After last week's latency 
issues - rooted on the old HP-RT systems and upstream facilities from the
NCF 
- this is a pleasant come-around.
-- 
Stonie R. Cooper
Planetary Data, Incorporated
ph. (402) 782-6611

  • 2002 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the ldm-users archives: