NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
I have used logging with Solaris for quite some time and have never noticed a problem..but ext2 is certainly very fast and I suppose that relatively speaking ext3 does extract quite a penalty. I would strongly recommend ext3 or some other Linux journaling file system for your non data partitions. I have never had corrupted files or lost file systems after power failures under Solaris UFS+logging, but I know that certainly does happen under ext2. -----Original Message----- Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:33 AM Cc: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Geff Underwood wrote: > Ext3 is ext2 with journalling (a system meant to make crash recovery > faster and more reliable) added. Thanks. With all those files to keep track of on the disk, I can see why it slows it down! **************************************************************************** *** Gilbert Sebenste ******** Internet: gilbert@xxxxxxx (My opinions only!) ****** Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *** web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** Work phone: 815-753-5492 * **************************************************************************** ***
ldm-users archives: