NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, David Knight wrote: > I thought .* by itself was OK on a request line. > It was only when the .* is followed by something > (i.e. .*\.windprofiler) that caused performance problems. This was my understanding as well. Please clarify. > (instead of requesting for example .*\.windprofiler > we should instead request \.windprofiler which should > yield the same result) > Is this not correct? > Thanks for clearing this up for me. On some feeds we do request > .* and I want to make sure we're not making inefficient requests... I'm sure most REQUEST lines are for ".*", so if it really is inefficient to use ".*" alone, we need to know what pattern to use for each feed instead. Tom ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom McDermott Email: tmcderm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Systems Administrator Phone: (585) 395-5718 Earth Sciences Dept. Fax: (585) 395-2416 SUNY College at Brockport
ldm-users archives: