RE: Many instances of LDM on the same machine

• To: "'Steve Emmerson'" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: RE: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
• From: "Lemay,Daniel [CMC]" <Daniel.Lemay@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:15:32 -0500

It's really that they  SHOULDN'T get any data that is not intended to them.

Daniel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Emmerson [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 21 November, 2003 17:07
> To: Lemay,Daniel [CMC]
> Cc: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Many instances of LDM on the same machine 
> 
> 
> Daniel,
> 
> >Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:45:47 -0500
> >From: "Lemay,Daniel [CMC]" <Daniel.Lemay@xxxxxxxx>
> >To: "'Steve Emmerson'" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
> 
> The above message contained the following:
> 
> > Suppose that I'm in the following situation:
> ...
> > -I want to be sure that my "clients" can only obtain the files that 
> > are intend for them. I don't want to rely on the fact they 
> will choose 
> > themselves the subset of the feed I allow them. I know that 
> I cannot 
> > insert a regular expression in my ALLOW statement to restrict what 
> > files they will have access.
> 
> That's an interesting situation (and one that I haven't considered).
> 
> Is it the case that each downstream site SHOULDN'T get the 
> other's data or that such feed-requests would merely be inefficient?
> 
> Regards,
> Steve Emmerson
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
    • From: Steve Emmerson
  • Re: Many instances of LDM on the same machine
    • From: David Knight