NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement

Yea, I already beat the GEMPAK Java thing to death on the gembud list myself.


-----Original Message-----
From: ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Ray Weber
Sent: Sun 3/30/2008 8:23 AM
To: Robert Mullenax; Tyler Allison; LDM-USERS
Subject: Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
 
Well like Tyler said, Java certainly doesnt produce trim fast code, so
a Java based gempak will likely be a step backward in performance.

Sorry if off topic a little..

Ray Weber
MA Skywarn
 


-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert Mullenax" <Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Tyler Allison" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LDM-USERS" 
<ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:28:51 -0500
Subject: Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement


Well another me, too I guess.

Well, if panic is setting in over GEMPAK going away (or going to Java), the 
double panic for this.  I don't want to sound ungrateful, but I can't 
imagine a worst decision than replacing LDM.  Why must the computing world 
continually change and upgrade for the sake of change and upgrade?

LDM is universally recognized as an incredibly stable and dependable 
program.  Can Unidata provide information on who is seeking a replacement 
for LDM?

Robert Mullenax
CSBF/NMSU
  • 2008 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the ldm-users archives: