Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement

• To: "patrick" <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert P Dale" <rdale@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
• From: "Robert Mullenax" <Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:45:38 -0500

Well..you missed out on that one.  It's a fact..and I attended AMS Annual 
meeting papers on it.  I will forward info.




-----Original Message-----
From: patrick [mailto:patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wed 4/2/2008 4:31 PM
To: Robert Mullenax; Robert P Dale; ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
 
> and the GEMPAK replacement will be Java based it's a reasonable 
> assumption..

what's all this talk about a gempak replacement, and God forbid a
java based one? gempak has always been based upon n-awips...
of course if they are switching over it's likely why chiz really left.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
    • From: Robert Mullenax

• References:
  • [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
    • From: Robert Mullenax
  • Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
    • From: Robert P Dale
  • Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
    • From: Robert Mullenax
  • Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
    • From: Robert P Dale
  • Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
    • From: Robert Mullenax
  • Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
    • From: patrick