NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 20:54 -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hi all, > > For those of you who feed NOAAport directly off the AMC-4 satellite, check > this out... > > Be advised of the following: > > > NOUS72 KNCF 241909 > > ADMNCF > > > > On or about May 1, 2008, the AWIPS SBN/NOAAPort data feed > > will be switched from the existing satellite, AMC-4, to the > > AMC-2 satellite. The satellite provider, SES Americom, is > > making the switch for preventative purposes. Satellite signal > > parameters on AMC-2 will be identical to that of AMC-4. > > No satellite receive equipment adjustments will be required. > > Only a 10 to 20 second interruption is anticipated as AMC-4 > > is deactivated and AMC-2 is activated. Once the planned switch > > time becomes available from SES Americom, additional messages > > will be sent. > > ncf/js > > I wonder how they're going to make it so that you don't have to adjust the > satellite. Maps show that AMC2 is well offset from AMC-4. This is very short notice on our end so I suspect there is an issue with AMC4. Since this is a transparent switch, its clear they've moved AMC2 from 85W over to 101W. AMC2 is a older satellite with a much smaller footprint. We've been investigating whether AMC2 will cover all our NOAAPORT customers. I did notice that AMC2 does not cover Hawaii, Puerto Rico or Alaska. I wonder what the NWS is going to do there? -- Dan Vietor <devo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ldm-users
archives: