Re: [ldm-users] question about UDP 111

• To: Mike Barth <Michael.F.Barth@xxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [ldm-users] question about UDP 111
• From: Michael Dross <mwdross@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:05:59 -0400

I have configured numerous firewalls over the years to pass LDM traffic, I
have only had to open port 388. If you can't
ldmping between two servers, then the firewall is not open on port 388. Make
sure your iptables is set up to pass traffic overt port 388.

-Mike

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Mike Barth <Michael.F.Barth@xxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems successfully connecting to an ldm server behind
> a firewall.  We can't ldmping in either direction as well.  Their
> firewall admin says:
>
> "I see traffic on 388 successful, but I am seeing a UDP 111 attempt.
> We have setup TCP 111, which I believe we should be using.  Is there a
> way to configure that application to use TCP 111 instead of UDP 111?"
>
> Does ldm do UDP 111 attempts?  If so (I don't know what this means anyway),
> is there a way to configure it to use TCP 111 instead?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> ldm-users mailing list
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/




-- 
Michael Dross
President / Meteorologist
Wright-Weather, LLC
Office 704-360-0054 | Mobile 704-302-5329
mdross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

• References:
  • [ldm-users] question about UDP 111
    • From: Mike Barth