NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Frank Colby wrote:
Hi Everyone,I laughed out loud when I read Gerry's last post. But really, some of us, maybe a fair number of us, aren't IT professionals, and while this group of postings about file systems has been pretty technical, it's of real benefit to me, since I haven't really worried about the kind of file system I use. We don't stress our LDM system too much, get a minimal amount of radar data, for instance, but I have noticed that when some of our many systems go down, fsck can take forever to finish its job. I do appreciate the information on alternatives, and hope I'm not in the minority!Thanks, Frank Colby UMass Lowell part time IT person, full time professor!
Ditto. I had been using EXT2 for years, but was frustrated at how many times the file system would corrupt. In a few cases, I would have to reformat and start all over, restoring from backup. With EXT3, it rarely corrupts, and when it does, a reboot and 60 seconds of journal restoring automagically fixes everything.
Sure, I don't like the occasional fsck for one hour every now and then, but it sure beats what I had before by a million miles in terms of stability. That said, ext4 looks very promising and faster if stable, and CentOS6 may be a good time for me to switch over and try it out.
******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *** web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** *******************************************************************************
ldm-users
archives: