- To: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: Gilbert Sebenste <sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:25:37 -0500 (CDT)
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, daryl herzmann wrote:
If you already had segmented pqact processes, this change would not increase performance. It is done so that pqact writes proper .state files without overwritting each other.
Gotcha. Ok, thanks for the help as always, Daryl! ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University **** E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *** web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu ** Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NIU_Weather ** Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/niu.weather * *******************************************************************************
- References:
- [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: Blair Trosper
- Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: Jeff Lake
- Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: Blair Trosper
- Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: Blair Trosper
- Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: Gilbert Sebenste
- Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: daryl herzmann
- Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: Gilbert Sebenste
- Re: [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?
- From: daryl herzmann
- [ldm-users] NEXRAD2 Latency/Fragmented Data?