Re: [ldm-users] noaaport signal

• To: Stonie Cooper <stonewall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [ldm-users] noaaport signal
• From: Gilbert Sebenste <sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:50:38 -0500 (CDT)

On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Phone wrote:

Sandy. And the basic issue of having your primary and secondary uplinks so geographically close to one another.

Secondary should be in Kansas City.

Wholeheartedly agree, but to immediately solve this dropout issue, now
that the storm has passed, they should go to another uplink site. And I'd
also throw in they should have a backup on another bird as well, just
like nearly every pay TV and broadcast network does, but...that won't
happen. :-(

Gilbert

*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste                                                    ********
(My opinions only!)                                                  ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University                      ****
E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                  ***
web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu                                      **
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NIU_Weather                            **
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/niu.weather                           *
*******************************************************************************

• References:
  • [ldm-users] noaaport signal
    • From: Patrick L. Francis
  • Re: [ldm-users] noaaport signal
    • From: Phone