NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Pete, No, I didn't. With your plots, I just did some more checking... Approximating your curve, I got similar results using GRB data from amazon. However, when I switch back to approximating the curve on https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/GOES16_FullDisk_Band.php?band=07&length=24 and plotting, my image again appears warmer. How do your plots compare to what's on the star site? Thanks... Art > From: "Pete Pokrandt" <poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "ARTHUR AUGUST PERSON" <aap1@xxxxxxx> > Cc: "ldm-users" <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 10:48:46 PM > Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Problem calculating GOES-16 brightness temperature > from > radiance > Art, > Did you ever get this figured out? I plotted up an ABI full disk image from > the > GRB Radiance data coming in from both the Unidata DIFAX feed and from the > tiled > NOAAPORT CMI data. They seem pretty much the same to me, considering > resolution > differences - 2km for GRB vs 6km for the NOAAPORT data. > GRB image - [ > http://whirlwind.aos.wisc.edu/~wxp/goes16/test/201801210430_fulldisk_grb.jpg | > http://whirlwind.aos.wisc.edu/~wxp/goes16/test/201801210430_fulldisk_grb.jpg ] > NOAAPORT image - [ > http://whirlwind.aos.wisc.edu/~wxp/goes16/test/201801210430_fulldisk.jpg | > http://whirlwind.aos.wisc.edu/~wxp/goes16/test/201801210430_fulldisk.jpg ] > Pete > [ > http://www.weather.com/tv/shows/wx-geeks/video/the-incredible-shrinking-cold-pool > ] -- > Pete Pokrandt - Systems Programmer > UW-Madison Dept of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences > 608-262-3086 - poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx > From: ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > on > behalf of Arthur A Person <aap1@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 4:45 PM > To: ldm-users > Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Problem calculating GOES-16 brightness temperature > from > radiance > All -- > I'm starting to think there may be a problem with the GOES-16 channel 7 GRB > NetCDF data. I wrote a short test code > (included below) that calculates brightness temperature and produces a png > file > with an abbreviated color table for comparison > with the NESDIS https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/GOES16_CONUS.php > imagery. > When using the channel 7 data, > the calculated imagery appears noticeably warmer, but when using channel 14 > data > (for example), the images appear > very close in value. > Would someone else mind taking a look at this and confirm whether this might > be > the case, or whether I'm just losing my mind? > Thanks! > Art > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > from netCDF4 import Dataset > import numpy as np > import matplotlib.pyplot as plt > from matplotlib.colors import LinearSegmentedColormap > filename = > "amazon/OR_ABI-L1b-RadC-M3C07_G16_s20180151547235_e20180151550019_c20180151550058.nc" > #filename = > "amazon/OR_ABI-L1b-RadC-M3C14_G16_s20180151547235_e20180151550008_c20180151550050.nc" > dataset = Dataset(filename,'r') > # Get coefficients for calculation of brightness temperature > planck_fk1 = dataset.variables['planck_fk1'][:] > planck_fk2 = dataset.variables['planck_fk2'][:] > planck_bc1 = dataset.variables['planck_bc1'][:] > planck_bc2 = dataset.variables['planck_bc2'][:] > print("planck_fk1: ",planck_fk1) > print("planck_fk2: ",planck_fk2) > print("planck_bc1: ",planck_bc1) > print("planck_bc2: ",planck_bc2) > # Read the radiance data > rad = dataset.variables['Rad'][:] > dataset.close() > # Calculate brightness temperature > bt = ( (planck_fk2 / (np.log( (planck_fk1/rad)+1 ))) - planck_bc1 ) / > planck_bc2 > bt = bt - 273.15 > # Create a color table to compare against > https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES/GOES16_CONUS.php imagery > red = [] > green = [] > blue = [] > valmin=-110. > valmax=55. > red.append( [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ) > green.append( [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ) > blue.append( [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ) > red.append( [ (-50.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 0.0, 0.0 ] ) > green.append( [ (-50.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 1.0, 1.0 ] ) > blue.append( [ (-50.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 0.0, 0.0 ] ) > red.append( [ (-40.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 0.0, 0.0 ] ) > green.append( [ (-40.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 0.0, 0.0 ] ) > blue.append( [ (-40.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 0.4, 0.4 ] ) > red.append( [ (-30.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 0.0, 0.8 ] ) > green.append( [ (-30.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 1.0, 0.8 ] ) > blue.append( [ (-30.0-valmin)/(valmax-valmin), 1.0, 0.8 ] ) > red.append( [ 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 ] ) > green.append( [ 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 ] ) > blue.append( [ 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 ] ) > cdict = {'red': red, 'green': green, 'blue': blue} > ctbl = LinearSegmentedColormap('custom', cdict) > # Set the figure size > fig = plt.figure(1, figsize=(23, 15)) > # Display the image > im = plt.imshow(bt, cmap=ctbl, vmin=valmin, vmax=valmax ) > # Display a color bar > cb = plt.colorbar( orientation='vertical', shrink=0.7, pad=0.01, aspect=30 ) > cb.set_label("Brightness Temperature (C)") > # Save the image to a png file > plt.savefig('plot.png', dpi=100) >> From: "Pete Pokrandt" <poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: "ARTHUR AUGUST PERSON" <aap1@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: "ldm-users" <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 9:03:11 PM >> Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Problem calculating GOES-16 brightness temperature >> from >> radiance >> Forgot to cc to the list. >> Here's a commented version of the script that I'm currently using to plot ABI >> channel 13 (clear channel IR window) but the calculation for BT should work >> for >> any of the channels 7-16. >> I am using just the radiance values read in from the netcdf files, without >> applying any scale/offset to them. Perhaps the netcdf4 read does that for >> us? I >> am reading the scale and offset info in for reference, and printing them out, >> but I am not using them in my calculations at all. >> If for some reason, the attachment doesn't come through, you can get the >> file at >> [ http://sysadm.aos.wisc.edu/~poker/goes16_GRB_fulldisk_IR13_ircm.py | >> http://sysadm.aos.wisc.edu/~poker/goes16_GRB_fulldisk_IR13_ircm.py ] >> Hope this helps, >> Pete >> [ >> http://www.weather.com/tv/shows/wx-geeks/video/the-incredible-shrinking-cold-pool >> ] -- >> Pete Pokrandt - Systems Programmer >> UW-Madison Dept of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences >> 608-262-3086 - poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> From: Arthur A Person <aap1@xxxxxxx> >> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 9:04 AM >> To: Pete Pokrandt >> Cc: ldm-users >> Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Problem calculating GOES-16 brightness temperature >> from >> radiance >> Pete, >> Thanks for the help. Actually, I already tried adding parens to the equation, >> including the variation you >> suggested, but the results are the same. Do you have a few lines of code that >> worked for you that you'd >> be willing to share? Or, do you recall whether there's any issue with netCDF >> auto-scaling the input data, >> or any units conversion that has to be included that's not in the >> documentation? >> Thanks... Art >>> From: "Pete Pokrandt" <poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: "ARTHUR AUGUST PERSON" <aap1@xxxxxxx>, "ldm-users" >>> <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 11:47:08 AM >>> Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Problem calculating GOES-16 brightness temperature >>> from >>> radiance >>> Art, >>> I think it may be a parenthesis/order of operations issue. I seem to recall >>> having this same issue when I first started working with the GRB data. >>> Try this: >>> bt = ( planck_fk2 / ( np.log((planck_fk1 / rad) + 1 )) - planck_bc1) / >>> planck_bc2 >>> Pete >>> From: ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on >>> behalf of Arthur A Person <aap1@xxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 7:43 AM >>> To: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [ldm-users] Problem calculating GOES-16 brightness temperature from >>> radiance >>> Hi... >>> I'm trying to calculate brightness temperature from radiance for GOES-16 IR >>> channel 7 using rebroadcast data >>> but my values compared to McIDAS imagery are coming out 15 to 20 degrees C >>> too >>> warm. I'm using the following >>> values and code: >>> Test imagery: >>> OR_ABI-L1b-RadC-M3C07_G16_s20180112232223_e20180112235008_c20180112235045.nc >>> rad (radiance) is read in from and auto-scaled by netCDF, >>> planck_fk1: 202263.0 >>> planck_fk2: 3698.18994140625 >>> planck_bc1: 0.4336099922657013 >>> planck_bc2: 0.9993900060653687 >>> bt = ( planck_fk2 / np.log( (planck_fk1/rad)+1 ) - planck_bc1 ) / planck_bc2 >>> bt = bt - 273.15 >>> Can anyone tell me if I'm missing a step or spot a dumb mistake? >>> Thanks... Art >>> -- >>> Arthur A. Person >>> Assistant Research Professor, System Administrator >>> Penn State Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science >>> email: aap1@xxxxxxx, phone: 814-863-1563 >> -- >> Arthur A. Person >> Assistant Research Professor, System Administrator >> Penn State Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science >> email: aap1@xxxxxxx, phone: 814-863-1563 > -- > Arthur A. Person > Assistant Research Professor, System Administrator > Penn State Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science > email: aap1@xxxxxxx, phone: 814-863-1563 -- Arthur A. Person Assistant Research Professor, System Administrator Penn State Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science email: aap1@xxxxxxx, phone: 814-863-1563
ldm-users
archives: