Re: [ldm-users] UNIDATA: Potential loss of history and knowledge

• To: "Herbster, Christopher G." <herbstec@xxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [ldm-users] UNIDATA: Potential loss of history and knowledge
• From: "Pavloski, Chuck" <cfp102@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:01:43 +0000
• Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=cfp102@xxxxxxx;

TOM!  I think you are getting paged here.

- Chuck

On Apr 23, 2020, at 9:28 PM, Herbster, Christopher G. 
<herbstec@xxxxxxxx<mailto:herbstec@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Sorry, I can't hold this in.  One of my greatest fears is a year of high 
attrition form our great staff at Unidata.  The volume of knowledge held by you 
long termers is massive.  Perhaps now is a time to ponder creating legacy 
videos.  Some of you know the entire history of the LDM.  This is important 
knowledge to share and, more importantly, remember!



————————————————
Chuck Pavloski, Ph.D.
ICDS Research Innovations with Scientists and Engineers (RISE) Team Lead
814-863-3094, cfp102@xxxxxxx<mailto:cfp102@xxxxxxx>

Institute for Computational and Data Sciences
The Pennsylvania State University
214N Computer Building
University Park, PA 16802
USA

• References:
  • [ldm-users] Efficiency of splitting pqacts
    • From: Mike Zuranski
  • [ldm-users] 20200423: Re: Efficiency of splitting pqacts
    • From: Tom Yoksas
  • Re: [ldm-users] 20200423: Re: Efficiency of splitting pqacts
    • From: Herzmann, Daryl E [AGRON]
  • Re: [ldm-users] 20200423: Re: Efficiency of splitting pqacts
    • From: Steven Emmerson
  • Re: [ldm-users] 20200423: Re: Efficiency of splitting pqacts
    • From: Knight, David
  • [ldm-users] UNIDATA: Potential loss of history and knowledge
    • From: Herbster, Christopher G.