NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
yes, the java and c libraries should work the same. if thats not the case, then we consider it a bug. Jon Blower wrote: > Thanks John - so am I correct in assuming that the Java port of > udunits should be able to understand every unit that the original > udunits can? > > Cheers, Jon > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 3:46 PM, John Caron <caron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Jon: >> >> ucar.units package has been stable for some years now, so its the same >> between 2.2 and 4.0. there is a separate version in the idv release, which >> is tuned for the visad packages. >> >> ucar.units is actively maintained; if you find bugs we'll fix them >> (eventually). new features may be less likely. >> >> there is no separate release so you'll need to extract it from the nj >> release. >> Regards, >> John >> >> Jon Blower wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm not sure whether I should be posting this to the udunits list, so >>> apologies if I'm on the wrong list. I'm interested in using the Java >>> port of udunits, separate from the NetCDF libs. As far as I can tell >>> the only way to get hold of Java-udunits is to download the source of >>> the NetCDF libs, is that right? Is Java-udunits under active >>> maintenance? Is the version used by nj4 different from that used in >>> nj22? >>> >>> Cheers, Jon >>> > > >
netcdf-java archives: