NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Thanks for hint. I'm also aware about performance issue. But anyway first of all I need ability to save large files from Java... Do you have any clue about how much it will be slower comparing to native "C" ? Cheers, Mark Balonkin -----Original Message----- From: netcdf-java-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:netcdf-java-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lyng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 11 декабря 2008 г. 16:42 To: netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [netcdf-java] NetCDF-java 4.0 release? On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 Mark Balonkin wrote: > We are thinking about implementation of java wrapper on "C" netcdf library. > Basically because we need large file support and also would be good to have > better performance. We don't need the whole functionality, just a basic > writing. But anyway it's still a bunch of work. If you're looking for better performance putting a "C" code in a Java wrapper is not the way to go. You will be disappointed in the performance of this approach. It is also extremely difficult to debug. _______________________________________________ netcdf-java mailing list netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
netcdf-java
archives: