NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: [netcdf-java] Quantize Support in netCDF-Fortran: Only Bit Groom possible?

  • To: Joe Lee <hyoklee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [netcdf-java] Quantize Support in netCDF-Fortran: Only Bit Groom possible?
  • From: John Caron <jcaron1129@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 06:32:21 -0600
Apparently its not needed for reading data:

"As part of the netcdf-c library, the quantize algorithms are available for
netCDF/HDF5 files, and the new ncZarr format, and produce data files that
are fully backward compatible for all versions of netcdf-c since 4.0, and
also fully compatible with netcdf-Java."

(see https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf-c/blob/main/docs/quantize.md)

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 11:51 AM Joe Lee via netcdf-java <
netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Does the current netCDF-Java also support it?
>
> I’m mostly concerned about Data Interoperability.
>
>
>
> *From: *netcdfgroup <netcdfgroup-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
> Thompson, Matt (GSFC-610.1)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC] via
> netcdfgroup <netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Date: *Friday, November 4, 2022 at 12:40 PM
> *To: *netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: *[netcdfgroup] Quantize Support in netCDF-Fortran: Only Bit
> Groom possible?
>
> netCDF List,
>
>
>
> I am looking to extend the model I work on, GEOS, to support using the new
> quantize options in netCDF. My question is: am I right in my reading of
> netCDF-Fortran that only Bit Groom is supported?
>
> I can see in netCDF-C that there seem to be three variants:
>
>
>
>    - Bit Groom
>    - Granular Bit Round
>    - Bit Round
>
>
>
> (see https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf-c/blob/main/docs/quantize.md)
>
>
>
> but in the netCDF-Fortran docs I only see it mention Bit Groom and my
> reading of the include files seem to back that up.
>
>
>
> So I was wondering: Is there a fundamental Fortran reason for not
> supporting the other two variants? Or perhaps, is it that, of the three
> variants, Bit Groom is by far the one people should use, so that's what was
> exposed by the Fortran interface?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matt Thompson, SSAI, Ld Scientific Programmer/Analyst
>
> NASA GSFC,    Global Modeling and Assimilation Office
>
> Code 610.1,  8800 Greenbelt Rd,  Greenbelt,  MD 20771
>
> Phone: 301-614-6712                 Fax: 301-614-6246
>
> *http://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/sed/bio/matthew.thompson
> <http://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/sed/bio/matthew.thompson>*
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are
> recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly
> available through the web.  Users who post to any of the lists we
> maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they
> do not want to be made public.
>
>
> netcdf-java mailing list
> netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
  • 2023 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the netcdf-java archives: