Re: Coordinate mapping conventions...

• To: Steve Emmerson <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Coordinate mapping conventions...
• From: montnaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Skip Montanaro)
• Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1992 09:38:11 EDT

Steve Emmerson writes:

 > >It seems to me that support for components and data to coordinate mapping 
 > >can be solved by adding a small extension to the netCDF language. Why not
 > >add support for something analogous to C structures. For instance, we might
 > >have the following definition:

That would be too easy... :-) The FORTRAN folks would have no way of
accessing structure elements.

Skip (montanaro@xxxxxxxxxx)

• References:
  • Re: Coordinate mapping conventions...
    • From: Joe Sirott
  • Re: Coordinate mapping conventions...
    • From: Steve Emmerson