NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hi, Dan Packman raises an important issue in that a single precision variable doesn't give enough accuracy for time in some circumstances. A more elegant solution than having two time variables would be to have double precision dimension variables. I think that IEEE double precision has enough bits to keep millisecond time for 10000 years -- it takes 49 bits to do this. If dimension variables can be only single or double precision, I would choose double precision. This would not waste much space in situations where such precision wasn't needed, so the overhead would be small. Dave Raymond raymond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
netcdfgroup
archives: