NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hmmm, I was wondering what happened to this group.... Heres a belated comment on the problem of 2d coordinate varibales: > > I was wondering if there was any way in the netCDF standard to have a 2-d > > dim- > > ension grid, ie, N "coordinates" each of which is a lat-lon pair, and then > > each > > field is defined on that grid. > > Yes, I did something like this for the UWM/COADS data set (see CDL > below). The problem is that no software appear able to read it > directly. In retrospect, I believe it was a mistake, we should have > adopted something like the COARDS conventions (which I don't whether it > existed back in 1990). I dont see anything in COARDS that deals with this. I have the May 1995 doc. Is there something more recent? > Actually, this idea goes back quite a way. The concept of "referential > attributes" was laid out in a report from the NetCDF Users Working > Group (NUWG) back in 1992.... A more obvious generalization of coordinate variables to the 2D case I think is: float mydata(time, lev, lat, lon); // coordinate system float lev(lev); float lat(lat, lon); float lon(lat, lon); I would like to hear any arguments against this idea, other than the obvious that its not (yet) a convention.
netcdfgroup
archives: