NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hi Harvey, On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Davies, Harvey wrote: > > A dataset that was written with a _FillValue within a specified valid > > range > > would not have that _FillValue treated as the valid default data value by > > many existing applications, i.e., such a dataset would break most existing > > applications. > > : > > I do not understand how this would break most existing applications. My experience with generic applications is that if values indicated by the _FillValue attribute are treated in some special way, they are treated that way independently of whether or not the _FillValue falls within a specified valid range. This is true for the first two generic applications that I tested, namely ncdump and ncview. ncdump uses `_' to represent data values that are equal to the `_FillValue' attribute for a variable, intended to represent data that has not yet been written. I verified that this behavior is true even when the _FillValue is within the valid range. This is not broken in the sense that ncdump is doing exactly what it says it does. But I think that most people would be unhappy to see '_' in their ncdump output for values that they consider to be valid. ncview also treats _FillValue as missing even if it's contained in a specified valid range. In an image of a 2D field this results in "valid" data being displayed in a color outside the color map. My conclusion from this is that _FillValue should never be used to indicate a default value for valid data, because it will be treated exactly as if it were missing, or never written, by most applications. Brian ----------------------------------------------------------------- Brian Eaton | email: eaton@xxxxxxxx Climate Modeling Section | National Center for Atmospheric Research | P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 |
netcdfgroup
archives: