NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
My apologies, I didn't make this clear enough, or else I don't exactly understand the answer. They are specifying dimensions as a way to define the length of character attributes, not for data parameters. Dimensions: time, dept, lat, long, string256, ... string4Attributes: Name Definition Example DataType char DataType(STRING32); “Real-time” PLATFORM char PLATFORM (STRING8); "PIRATA"
Do you think it is reasonable to include these string dimensions in the standard specification, when they are not dimensions of data parameters?
> I'm working on an implementation of NetCDF with a very varied > group, and the issue of string lengths is a real problem for some > of them. All our data is numeric; attributes are often char > though. I believe this is the way to go for defining char arrays in netCDF-3. Of course, you don't need to define dimensions for attributes, so if you can put your string in an attribute, that may be easier.
Thanks again - Nan Galbraith -- ************************************************************** * Nan Galbraith Upper Ocean Processes Group * * Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02540 * * http://uop.whoi.edu (508) 289-2444 * ************************************************************** ============================================================================== To unsubscribe netcdfgroup, visit: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html ==============================================================================
netcdfgroup
archives: