NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hello, I was away from office for a while but I would like to thank you all, especially those who contributed some ideas to the solution of my problem. It was rather strange, if you ask me. All I have to do is to change the name of the f90 code to something like module w_netcdf instead of module write_netcdf_3d_field and then in main f77 code: use w_netcdf instead of use write_netcdf_3d_field Keep on doing good work! Goran On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 17:27 +0000, Michael Bane wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 00:53 +0100, Goran Georgievski wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have some read/write modules written in free form fortran (Fortran 90) > > and I have some fortran77 code that writes standard fortran binary > > files. However, I would prefer to have output in netcdf format. The > > question is if I can compile and link, fortran90 netcdf write module > > with the fortran 77 code. The platform that I am working on is Linux > > with Intel Fortran Compiler 8.1 and netcdf library version 3.6.0-p1. > > > > ifort compiles the write netcdf module (f90 code), and it compiles the > > main code (f77) if I comment the lines that calls netcdf write > > subroutines. When I am trying to compile including these lines, ifort > > complains that it cannot find the module for writing netcdf. (ERROR in > > opening the Library module file [WRITE_3D_NETCDF_FIELD]) > > > > Below are the headers of my netcdf write module and headers of main code > > that calls subroutine to write netcdf field, and the makefile that > > compiles everything. If somebody could tell me what I am doing wrong and > > point me to the solution, I would be the most thankful. > > > > Goran > > In addition to pts made by others you should ensure all modules are > compiled with same version of the compiler. I doubt this is your problem > but always worth remembering. > > I think you also need to have the mod file as requirements for your > exec... with ifort it's a mess setting up a Makefile > > M > > _______________________________________________ > netcdfgroup mailing list > netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ >
netcdfgroup archives: