Re: [netcdfgroup] Is this likely due to netcdf?

• To: michael bane <michael.bane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [netcdfgroup] Is this likely due to netcdf?
• From: "H.Dang" <danghy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:29:28 -0400

Hi Paul and Michael,

Thanks for your suggestion. I'll recompile using the same compilter:)

Cheers
Hongyan
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:47 PM, michael bane <michael.bane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

>
> On 26 May 2010, at 18:33, H.Dang wrote:
>
>  Hello~
>>
>> I met the following problem when I compiling CMAQ source codes:
>>
>>  
>> -DSUBST_PADAT_ID=\"/brosto2/jcl_data/hdang/M3HOME/CMAQ_ADJv4.5/models/include/release/pa_noop/PA_DAT.EXT\"
>> calc_obsgrad.F
>> PGF90-F-0004-Corrupt or Old Module file
>> /brosto2/jcl_data/hdang/M3HOME/CMAQ_ADJv4.5/scripts/cctm/MOD_DIR/netcdf.mod
>> (calc_obsgrad.F: 55)
>> PGF90/any Linux/x86-64 6.1-6: compilation aborted
>> make: *** [calc_obsgrad.o] Error 2
>>
>> If I comment out the line "use netcdf" in calc_obsgrad.F, I can get the
>> object file. I've "make clean" the netcdf, deleted files in include/ and
>> lib/ folder, and re-installed netcdf, but I get the same problem again. The
>> process I install netcdf-3.6.2 is:
>>
>> ./configure --prefix=[current path]
>> make CC=gcc CPP=g++
>> make install
>> make check
>>
>> seems no problem. My CMAQ code and netCDF work well on another machine.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>
> Your errors talk of out of date modules: are all modules all built with the
> compiler and the same version... F90 is picnickedty
> M
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Michael K Bane
> Senior Development Officer
> RESEARCH COMPUTING SERVICES
> Devonshire House
> Precinct Centre
> The University of Manchester
> Manchester
> M13 9PL
>
> www.rcs.manchester.ac.uk
> www.twitter.com/mkbane_mcr
> www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=73597922129
>
>


-- 
Cordially,
Hongyan
鸿雁

• References:
  • [netcdfgroup] Is this likely due to netcdf?
    • From: H.Dang
  • Re: [netcdfgroup] Is this likely due to netcdf?
    • From: michael bane