NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
If you don't need features of the netCDF-4 data model, I would recommend to stay in the "classic" model (e.g., netCDF-3). There is still software which does not support all the features of netCDF-4 (including the R interface package where I'm the author). It depends therefore on the structure your datasets will have. If you can write them using the netCDF-3 data model, there's in my opinion no need for netCDF-4. Anyway, the netCDF-4 library can read/write also the "classic" format. +1 for netCDF-3 Pavel ------------------------------------------------------------ Pavel Michna (PhD Student) Climatology and Meteorology (KLIMET) Institute of Geography University of Bern Hallerstrasse 12 CH-3012 Bern/Switzerland E-Mail: michna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:michna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tel: +41 31 631 85 42 Fax: +41 31 631 85 11 ------------------------------------------------------------
netcdfgroup archives: