Re: [netcdfgroup] better to distribute data in netCDF-4/classic or netcdf-3?

To: NetCDF Group List <netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [netcdfgroup] better to distribute data in netCDF-4/classic or netcdf-3?
From: "Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102)" <christopher.s.lynnes@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:52:31 -0500

Hey, folks, thanks for all the feedback!  There seem to be enough tools out 
there that have not gotten to netCDF-4 yet that we will have to stick to 
netCDF-3 for now, though I will be watching this space for announcement of tool 
upgrades.

I have a followup question:  one of the use cases we had for netCDF-4 was that 
the underlying storage format is HDF5, making them readable by *hdf* tools like 
HDFview.  Some of our users like its spreadsheet-style interface for examining 
data values.  Is there a netcdf tool with an equivalent capability?  (Panoply 
has some capability in that vein, but it's more limited than HDFView.)
--
Dr. Christopher Lynnes     NASA/GSFC, Code 610.2    phone: 301-614-5185

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [netcdfgroup] better to distribute data in netCDF-4/classic or netcdf-3?
  - From: David W. Pierce
- Re: [netcdfgroup] better to distribute data in netCDF-4/classic or netcdf-3?
  - From: Roy Mendelssohn

References:
- [netcdfgroup] better to distribute data in netCDF-4/classic or netcdf-3?
  - From: Lynnes, Christopher S. (GSFC-6102)
- Re: [netcdfgroup] better to distribute data in netCDF-4/classic or netcdf-3?
  - From: Heiko Klein
- Re: [netcdfgroup] better to distribute data in netCDF-4/classic or netcdf-3?
  - From: Doug Hunt