NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: [netcdfgroup] what is status of netCDF3 vs netCDF4?

We have the same issue as Tim, in that we haven't been able to find many
good examples of NetCDF-4 for test purposes. We've been updating NCL to
handle NetCDF-4 better, but need to get a better test suite in place for
this.

For example, I wanted to find a NetCDF-4 file with groups, but after
googling for quite a while last night, I gave up.  I did find some in the
NetCDF source tree, but these seem like toy examples, and I'm hoping to
find something more "real world".

--Mary



On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Timothy Patterson <
Timothy.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> EUMETSAT plans to create netCDF-4 products for the upcoming MTG and EPS-SG
> missions. We want to make use of the netCDF-4 enhanced features such as
> groups, but we found very few examples of others using this format, let
> alone the enhanced features. This slow uptake probably also explains the
> lack of netCDF-4-ready tools. But with more users moving to netCDF-4 I
> would expect there to be a bigger incentive to update tools to support it.
> There is now a group looking to update the CF-Conventions to cover netCDF-4
> so it does appear to be gaining acceptance.
>
> If anybody wants to start a netCDF-4 support group, I'd also be interested
> in hearing  what problems other netCDF-4 users have encountered and
> overcome and which tools they have found available.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Patterson
> Consultant
> EUMETSAT
> Eumetsat-Allee 1
> 6429 Darmstadt
> Germany
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netcdfgroup-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> netcdfgroup-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cathy Smith (NOAA
> Affiliate)
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:53 PM
> To: netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [netcdfgroup] what is status of netCDF3 vs netCDF4?
>
> NetCDF'ers
> We've changed many of our files from netCDF3 to netCDF4 both to take
> advantage of internal packing but also because they work better in some
> software (NCL). We have heard from users of problems reading the newer
> format. Often they don't have their applications or netCDF library upgraded
> to the latest versions but sometimes, software they relied on isn't
> available for netCDF4. For example, EXCEL does not have a netCDF4 interface
> and a package called "FAN" probably doesn't. Should we be assuming users
> and software developers ought to be netCDF4 ready or is
> netCDF4 more of a language for advanced users and there is no expectation
> that users use it as opposed to netCDF3? Should unidata be facilitating the
> update of packages to netCDF4? I'm thinking more of local software such as
> on this page http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/Contrib.html but
> also packages like EXCEL.
> We do suggest users can convert the files back to netCDF3 if possible but
> there are downsides to that for the users.
>
> Thanks,
> Cathy Smith
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------
> NOAA/ESRL PSD and CU CIRES
> 303-497-6263
> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/cathy.smith/
>
> Emails about data/webpages may get quicker responses from emailing
> esrl.psd.data@xxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> netcdfgroup mailing list
> netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
> _______________________________________________
> netcdfgroup mailing list
> netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
  • 2014 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the netcdfgroup archives: