Re: [netcdfgroup] Future file formats

• To: netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: [netcdfgroup] Future file formats
• From: "dmh@xxxxxxxx" <dmh@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:44:10 -0600

Actually, the term "netcdf-5" got usurped by the
developers of pnetcdf, which supports a slightly extended
version of netcdf-3. The most recent versions of the netcdf-c
library support the netcdf-5 format
So the next available number would
be netcdf-6.

You might look at this.
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/en/entry/high-performance-netcdf-4-proposal

=Dennis Heimbigner
 Unidata


On 11/1/2017 1:27 PM, Julian Kunkel wrote:

Dear all,
there was many years ago the April fool:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/entry/netcdf_5_format_to_be

I'm just curious if there are activities known by you that actually
move on towards any NetCDF-5 format?

Regards,
Julian

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [netcdfgroup] Future file formats
    • From: Gerry Creager - NOAA Affiliate

• References:
  • [netcdfgroup] Future file formats
    • From: Julian Kunkel