NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Wei-king, it can not be chunk settings, because the storage type of all arrays is contiguous, not chunked. See the ncdump -hs output below. Therefore this file does not contain any chunks in the HDF5 formal sense. Thank you for the information about extracting storage details with h5dump and h5stat. I was unfamiliar with how to get these details for HDF5/netcdf-4. On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 9:55 AM Wei-Keng Liao <wkliao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For HDF5 files, command “h5dump -Hp ndb.BS_COMPRESS0.005000_Q1” shows > the data chunk settings used by all datasets in the file. > > Command “h5stat -Ss ndb.BS_COMPRESS0.005000_Q1” shows information about > free space, metadata, raw data, etc. > > They may reveal why your file is abnormal big. > Most likely it is the chunk setting you used. > > Wei-keng > > > On May 1, 2020, at 6:40 PM, Davide Sangalli <davide.sangalli@xxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > I also add > > > > ncvalidator ndb.BS_COMPRESS0.005000_Q1 > > Error: Unknow file signature > > Expecting "CDF1", "CDF2", or "CDF5", but got "�HDF" > > File "ndb.BS_COMPRESS0.005000_Q1" fails to conform with CDF file format > specifications > > > > Best, > > D. > > > > On 02/05/20 01:26, Davide Sangalli wrote: > >> Output of ncdump -hs > >> > >> D. > >> > >> ncdump -hs BSK_2-5B_X59RL-50B_SP_bse-io/ndb.BS_COMPRESS0.005000_Q1 > >> > >> netcdf ndb.BS_COMPRESS0 { > >> dimensions: > >> BS_K_linearized1 = 2025000000 ; > >> BS_K_linearized2 = 781887360 ; > >> complex = 2 ; > >> BS_K_compressed1 = 24776792 ; > >> variables: > >> char BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED1_DONE(BS_K_linearized1) ; > >> BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED1_DONE:_Storage = "contiguous" ; > >> char BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED2_DONE(BS_K_linearized1) ; > >> BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED2_DONE:_Storage = "contiguous" ; > >> char BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED3_DONE(BS_K_linearized2) ; > >> BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED3_DONE:_Storage = "contiguous" ; > >> float BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED1(BS_K_compressed1, complex) ; > >> BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED1:_Storage = "contiguous" ; > >> BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED1:_Endianness = "little" ; > >> // global attributes: > >> :_NCProperties = > "version=1|netcdflibversion=4.4.1.1|hdf5libversion=1.8.18" ; > >> :_SuperblockVersion = 0 ; > >> :_IsNetcdf4 = 1 ; > >> :_Format = "netCDF-4" ; > >> > >> > >> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 12:24 AM +0200, "Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate" < > dave.allured@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> I agree that you should expect the file size to be about 1 byte per > stored character. IMO the most likely explanation is that you have a > netcdf-4 file with inappropriately small chunk size. Another possibility > is a 64-bit offset file with crazy huge padding between file sections. > This is very unlikely, but I do not know what is inside > your writer code. > >> > >> Diagnose, please. Ncdump -hs. If it is 64-bit offset, I think > ncvalidator can display the hidden pad sizes. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:37 PM Davide Sangalli <davide.sangalli@xxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> I'm a developer of a fortran code which uses netcdf for I/O > >> > >> In one of my runs I created a file with some huge array of characters. > >> The header of the file is the following: > >> netcdf ndb.BS_COMPRESS0 { > >> dimensions: > >> BS_K_linearized1 = 2025000000 ; > >> BS_K_linearized2 = 781887360 ; > >> variables: > >> char BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED1_DONE(BS_K_linearized1) ; > >> char BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED2_DONE(BS_K_linearized1) ; > >> char BSE_RESONANT_COMPRESSED3_DONE(BS_K_linearized2) ; > >> } > >> > >> The variable is declared as nf90_char which, according to the > documentation should be 1 byte per element. > >> Thus I would expect the total size of the file to be 1 > byte*(2*2025000000+781887360) ~ 4.5 GB > >> Instead the file size is 16059445323 bytes ~ 14.96 GB, i.e. 10.46 GB > more and a factor 3.33 bigger > >> > >> This happens consistently if I consider the file > >> netcdf ndb { > >> dimensions: > >> complex = 2 ; > >> BS_K_linearized1 = 2025000000 ; > >> BS_K_linearized2 = 781887360 ; > >> variables: > >> float BSE_RESONANT_LINEARIZED1(BS_K_linearized1, complex) ; > >> char BSE_RESONANT_LINEARIZED1_DONE(BS_K_linearized1) ; > >> float BSE_RESONANT_LINEARIZED2(BS_K_linearized1, complex) ; > >> char BSE_RESONANT_LINEARIZED2_DONE(BS_K_linearized1) ; > >> float BSE_RESONANT_LINEARIZED3(BS_K_linearized2, complex) ; > >> char BSE_RESONANT_LINEARIZED3_DONE(BS_K_linearized2) ; > >> } > >> The float component should weight ~36 GB while the char component > should be identical to before, i.e. 4.5 GB for a total of 40.5 GB > >> The file is instead ~ 50.96 GB, i.e. again a factor 10.46 GB bigger > than expected. > >> > >> Why ? > >> > >> My character variables are something like > >> "tnnnntnnnntnnnnnnnntnnnnnttnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnt..." > >> but the file size is already like that just after the file creation, > i.e. before filling it. > >> > >> Few info about the library, compiled linking to HDF5 (hdf5-1.8.18), > with parallel IO support: > >> Name: netcdf > >> Description: NetCDF Client Library for C > >> URL: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/netcdf > >> Version: 4.4.1.1 > >> Libs: -L${libdir} -lnetcdf -ldl -lm > /nfs/data/bin/Yambo/gcc-8.1.0/openmpi-3.1.0/yambo_ext_libs/gfortran/mpifort/v4/parallel/lib/libhdf5hl_fortran.a > /nfs/data/bin/Yambo/gcc-8.1.0/openmpi-3.1.0/yambo_ext_libs/gfortran/mpifort/v4/parallel/lib/libhdf5_fortran.a > /nfs/data/bin/Yambo/gcc-8.1.0/openmpi-3.1.0/yambo_ext_libs/gfortran/mpifort/v4/parallel/lib/libhdf5_hl.a > /nfs/data/bin/Yambo/gcc-8.1.0/openmpi-3.1.0/yambo_ext_libs/gfortran/mpifort/v4/parallel/lib/libhdf5.a > -lz -lm -ldl -lcurl > >> Cflags: -I${includedir} > >> > >> Name: netcdf-fortran > >> Description: NetCDF Client Library for Fortran > >> URL: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/netcdf > >> Version: 4.4.4 > >> Requires.private: netcdf > 4.1.1 > >> Libs: -L${libdir} -lnetcdff > >> Libs.private: -L${libdir} -lnetcdff -lnetcdf > >> Cflags: -I${includedir} > >> > >> Best, > >> D. > >> -- > >> Davide Sangalli, PhD > >> CNR-ISM, Division of Ultrafast Processes in Materials (FLASHit) and MaX > Centre > >> Area della Ricerca di Roma 1, 00016 Monterotondo Scalo, Italy > >> http://www.ism.cnr.it/en/davide-sangalli-cv/ > >> http://www.max-centre.eu/ >
netcdfgroup
archives: