NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hi Roy, Sorry about the lack of response and the lack of clear documentation. We will check the documentation and clarify. Ethan On 2/23/2012 3:35 PM, Roy Mendelssohn wrote: > Hi All: > On Feb 23, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Hoop wrote: > >> Ethan, >> >> I looked at the featureCollection documentation link you gave, but since >> our data are not forecasts, nor point data, nor in GRIB2 format, that >> didn't seem the right fit. Maybe I'm wrong; I'm severely sleep-deprived >> right now.... >> > > > > Awhile back I wrote, and never got a response, that > "featureCollection" appeared to now be the preferred method to do > aggregations, but the docs were really unclear as to how to do this for > simple aggregations, or even if for the present version of TDS it is the > preferred method. > > What would really help is if it could be a clear statement as to > whether featureCollection is the preferred method, if the what has been > the usual method through "datascan" and the like will be deprecated in > the future, and clear documentation on not only setting up aggregations > using featureCollection, but good (ie realistic, not trivial) examples > of converting existing aggregations to featureCollection. > > Thanks > > -Roy
thredds
archives: