NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Yoshi, Below my expertise on TDS (v4.3 and v4.6) El 19/02/2016 a las 7:26, Yoshiyuki Kudo escribió:
Hi, I am in a project where bunch of EO data researchers will use some data access services for an attempt to create new data products out of the wealth of the data pool. The data will be EO data (coverage data) in netCDF, some GBytes per data granule, and will amount to over 120TB, 0.3 million data files in total (1 year worth of collection). I feel TDS or Hyrax can be a good candidate for this platform, but would like to hear your advice before further estimation of work and hardware purchase. I very much appreciate your expertise on this. 1) I see some historical threads about how aggregation of large volumes of data can be problematic. I will need to consider the aggregation as well, but is the 100TB+ aggregation possible ? Both technically and performance wise ?
We have an operational service which aggregate collections of datasets. One of the aggregations consist in 135k files in GRIB1 format and 13TB of data. Another collection is based on 300k+ files but 8TB on size. This collections are aggregated in just one NetCDF entity using a NCML, each one. The 100TB+ of aggregation will be possible, but the limit will be the performance because the amount of files.
No, you don't need to have just one partition. But In our case we have 400TB of disk based in ZFS (OpenIndiana) using a pool of 150 desktop HDDs, using a configuration of raidz2 vdev (10+2 disks). For TDS services we are using a load-balanced configuration with TDS instances running in a cluster.2) Is there any HW restriction for the TDS set up I should have in mind before preparing the HW ? Do I need to have a single disk drive (partition) for the 100+TB data management in TDS ?
3) Could you share any success story you know of, about handling large volumes of data in a TDS ?
https://rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/attachment/20150924_Day2_1330_End-userGatewayForClimateServicesAndDataInitiatives_Cofino.pdf
We considered, at the beginning, dynamic aggregation based on scan directory facilities provided by TDS, but at the end it didn't perform well, and what are we doing is generate static ncml aggregations.4) Any other recommendation or things I need to keep in mind ?
Thank you so much for your support.
Please feel free to ask. Regards Antonio -- Antonio S. Cofiño Grupo de Meteorología de Santander Dep. de Matemática Aplicada y Ciencias de la Computación Universidad de Cantabria http://www.meteo.unican.es
Yoshi _______________________________________________ thredds mailing list thredds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
thredds
archives: