NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Greetings Simon, It almost looks like this is an issue of how the pixel is defined - it's like there is an offset of 0.5 pixel between the green and grey layer. I do not have any experience with any of the GIS packages. Anyone out there experienced this before? Sean On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Wright, Simon M. <smw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear THREDDS mailing list > > > > We have set THREDDS up to host a WMS for some netCDF files. These netCDF > files have a 5 km resolution and are in the EPSG:3035 coordinate reference > system. The metadata header for one of the netCDF files is as follows: > > > > netcdf Z:/thredds/edge/edge-mockup-20160711-RCP2_6-ECMWF-NOAA- > indicator01.nc { > > dimensions: > > time = UNLIMITED; // (17 currently) > > x = 1000; > > y = 950; > > variables: > > float indicator(time=17, y=950, x=1000); > > :_FillValue = -9999.0f; // float > > :standard_name = "indicator01"; > > :long_name = "indicator01"; > > :units = "-"; > > :RCP = "RCP2_6"; > > :GCM = "ECMWF"; > > :HYDROMODEL = "NOAA"; > > :coordinates = "time y x"; > > :grid_mapping = "lambert_azimuthal_equal_area"; > > :missing_value = -9999.0f; // float > > :valid_min = 0.0; // double > > :valid_max = 22.8378; // double > > :_ChunkSizes = 6, 317, 334; // int > > > > int lambert_azimuthal_equal_area; > > :grid_mapping_name = "lambert_azimuthal_equal_area"; > > :longitude_of_projection_origin = "10.0"; > > :latitude_of_projection_origin = "52.0"; > > :false_easting = "4321000.0"; > > :false_northing = "3210000.0"; > > :_CoordinateTransformType = "Projection"; > > :_CoordinateAxisTypes = "GeoX GeoY"; > > > > double lat(y=950, x=1000); > > :standard_name = "latitude"; > > :long_name = "latitude coordinate"; > > :units = "degrees_north"; > > :_ChunkSizes = 475, 500; // int > > > > double lon(y=950, x=1000); > > :standard_name = "longitude"; > > :long_name = "longitude coordinate"; > > :units = "degrees_east"; > > :_ChunkSizes = 475, 500; // int > > > > double time(time=17); > > :_FillValue = -9999.0; // double > > :long_name = "time"; > > :units = "seconds since 2019-01-01 23:59:59"; > > :calendar = "gregorian"; > > :_ChunkSizes = 17; // int > > :_CoordinateAxisType = "Time"; > > > > double x(x=1000); > > :standard_name = "projection_x_coordinate"; > > :long_name = "x coordinate of projection"; > > :units = "Meter"; > > :_ChunkSizes = 1000; // int > > :_CoordinateAxisType = "GeoX"; > > > > double y(y=950); > > :standard_name = "projection_y_coordinate"; > > :long_name = "y coordinate of projection"; > > :units = "Meter"; > > :_ChunkSizes = 950; // int > > :_CoordinateAxisType = "GeoY"; > > } > > > > Displaying the netCDF file via the Godiva 2 viewer in THREDDS seems to > work as expected, but when overlaying other datasets in other software > packages (e.g. QGIS, ArcGIS, etc.) there is a noticeable offset/error in > the WMS images generated by THREDDS. > > > > To spot the offset, we load the WMS from THREDDS and the original source > data from the netCDF file as layers in QGIS. In the attached image > (QGIS-error.png), you can clearly see that the grey (local netCDF file) > layer is not completely hidden by the green (THREDDS WMS) layer. > > > > We assume that this is something to do with re-projection of the data? > Pulling an image from the THREDDS WMS in the EPSG:3035 projection system > yields the same sort of offset. A call with WMS parameters > SRS=EPSG:3035&BBOX=3615000,3550000,3620000,3555000 in our mind should > return a single pixel from the netCDF data, however it doesn't. > > > > One other thing to note is that QGIS reports the source projection > definition as '+proj=laea +lat_0=52 +lon_0=10 +x_0=4321000 +y_0=3210000 > +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs' which differs from > EPSG:3035 in its datum. However we don't think this should matter as the > same netCDF file is being processed by QGIS and THREDDS. > > > > Therefore, should the coordinate reference system in the netCDF file be > defined in a different way or is there a bug in the ncWMS used by the > THREDDS? > > > > > > > > Many thanks for any help that people can provide, best wishes, Simon. > ------------------------------ > This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is > subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this > email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt > from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in > an electronic records management system. > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are > recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly > available through the web. Users who post to any of the lists we > maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they > do not want to be made public. > > > thredds mailing list > thredds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ >
thredds
archives: