NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hi, I would like to know if the following statements about terminologies used in VisAD unit system are correct: * "quantity name" is something like "length" * "unit name" is like "meter" * for BaseUnit "unit symbol" is "unit identifier", and is like "m" * "identifier" for derived unit is the same as the BaseUnit if derived from one BaseUnit otherwise "null", unless assigned explicitely * "unit defination" is "unit identifier" for BaseUnit and PromiscuousUnit * "unit defination" is composed by getIdentifier() for Derived and ScaledUnit Say if I creat a unit foo=SI.meter.multiply(2); and another unit bar= DerivedUnit({SI.meter},{2}); Are foo and bar actually the same class objects? If yes, why does DerivedUnit.multiply() return Unit instead of DerivedUnit? If not, why not? What should I do if I want to give foo an identifier? Why doesn't the Unit class have a method to set identifier? More generally, I would like to know why are BaseUnit, DerivedUnit and ScaledUnit on the same level of inheritance hierarchy? Conceptually a BaseUnit is a DerivedUnit that has undergon zero/no derivation, therefore can be treated "a kind of", or "a subset of", or a subclass of what is now called the DerivedUnit, and ScaledUnit can be also seen as a special case of DerivedUnit. The Developers Guide (2.5 years old) doesn't mention what is the thinking behind the DerivedUnit and ScaledUnit. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
visad
archives: