NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
No, I used the first method (index -> (lat, lon)) I'll give the 2nd method a try and let you know. Thanks! -kevin. Don Murray wrote:
Kevin- Kevin Manross wrote:Once again, Don, you save the day! Higher Resolution: http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/KIWA-hiResAP.gif Lower Resolution: http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/KIWA-lowResAP.gif"Resolution" is defined by A) the number of points along the radial line and B) the number of radials sampled per degree azimuth.Now, is there a way to connect the dots so that I have several discrete 2D "blobs" instead of rows of points? I.e., from the above examples, you can make out 2D features that basically indicate mountain tops.Which method did you use - the (index -> (lat,lon)) or the (lat,lon) -> value)? I would think that the latter would give you what you want, but if that's what you are using, then I'm not sure what' going on. Don ************************************************************* Don Murray UCAR Unidata Program dmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx P.O. Box 3000 (303) 497-8628 Boulder, CO 80307 http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/donm *************************************************************
-- +------------------------------------------------------------+ Kevin L. Manross [KD5MYD] (405)-366-0557 CIMMS Research Associate kevin.manross@xxxxxxxx [NSSL-WRDD/SWATN] http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross "My opinions are my own and not representative of CIMMS, NSSL, NOAA or any affiliates" +------------------------------------------------------------+
visad archives: