NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hi Bill, Bill Hibbard wrote:
You could try to make the geometry of each beam a little wider so they overlap. That might give you the effect you want.
The beams already overlap (please see: http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/VCPRPE_AllBeamWidthsFilled_overlap.gif )Notice the double yellow-dashed lines. Where they are close to each other is actually where the beams overlap. If you look closely, you can see the edge of the pink beam width (1.45) underneath the purple beam width (2.4), but where they overlap there is no blending of color or opacity.
On a different topic,For DefaultRendererJ3D, the array of DataReferences must consist of exactly one DataReference. For what you want to do, you must put the call to addReferences() inside the loop, and pass only one DataReference at a time (in a single length array if you like). The signature allows multiple DataReferences for those custom DataRenderers that can handle them.
So it is one DataRenderer per one DataReference? And if I want to have an array of DataReferences "linked" to a single DataRenderer, must I create a custom DataRenderer?
Thanks for your help! -kevin. -- +------------------------------------------------------------+ Kevin L. Manross [KD5MYD] <>< (405)-366-0557 CIMMS Research Associate kevin.manross@xxxxxxxx [NSSL-WRDD/SWATN] http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross "My opinions are my own and not representative of CIMMS, NSSL, NOAA or any affiliates" +------------------------------------------------------------+
visad archives: