NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Hello,this is strange. I've got a small example that runs ok. There were a handful of points. In my app, however, I have some 2000 points. Triangulation is never a problem, but the thing refuses to resample. It returns NaNs.
I've made sure the sets overlap and that the math types are the same. I'm not ruling a mistake by myself, but... Any ideas about what might be going wrong?
Thanks in advance, Ugo Tom Rink wrote:
Hi Ugo, This operation is implemented, and should work. There can be problems sometimes with precision and coincident data points. If your willing to post a small program or the data to the list we can take a look. TomR Ugo Taddei wrote:Hi, there I go again on the subject of irregular sets... Is it possible to do something like FlatField bigField = ...// large field with Irregular2DSet as domain set Set smallSet = ...small irregular 2D setFlatField smallField = (FlatField)bigField.resample( smallSet, Data.WEIGHTED_AVERAGE, Data.NO_ERRORS);Before I had a Linear2DSet as my smallSet, and it worked fine (but "slow"). It is now returning "missing". The fields do (partially) overlap, however. I expected at least some values to return NaNs.I'm not sure if the mistake is somewhere else or if this is not possible/implemented.Thanks for the help, Ugo
-- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 184960 fax ++49 +228 732153http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
visad archives: